Bonfire of the Liberties
March 12th, 2010

“Your 10 questions for would-be MPs” – Henry Porter, The Guardian.

“Ten reasons to feel uneasy” – Anthony Barnett, opendemocracy.net

Last night I was at the launch of Keith Ewing’s new book Bonfire of the Liberties“a provocative book which confronts the corrosion of civil liberties under successive New Labour governments since 1997.”

I was one of the speakers at this packed out event held at NUJ headquarters along side Jeremy Dear, NUJ general secretary; Henry Porter, novelist and political columnist for The Observer; Dave Smith, from the Blacklist Support Group; Cerie Bullivant, who was on a control order for two years and Pennie Quinton, who took Section 44 to Strasbourg.

Dave Smith’s contribution on blacklisting in the UK construction industry and the attacks on trade unionists was very powerful.

We have to keep an eye on databases of multinationals as much as the states. It is important to defend our Article 11 rights as trade unionists to meet without being put under surveillance and harassed, by either the state or private companies.

The investigations on police surveillance of protesters and journalists as well as the covert state targeting of environmental activists that I worked on with Paul Lewis at The Guardian are mentioned in Ewing’s book which was a nice surprise.


“I’m Photographer Not a Terrorist!” pops up at NUJ ADM!
November 20th, 2009

201109_marcvallee_adm_1
SOUTHPORT, UNITED KINGDOM – 20.11.09. NUJ General secretary Jeremy Dear in a lighter moment before the start of the National Union of Journalists Annual Delegate Meeting in Southport, England on Friday 20 November 2009. NUJ members from across the county have come together to tackle the major issues effecting media workers in Britain today. (Photo by Marc Vallee/marcvallee.co.uk) (c) Marc Vallée, 2009.

“I’m Photographer Not a Terrorist!” pops up at NUJ ADM!

201109_marcvallee_adm_2
SOUTHPORT, UNITED KINGDOM – 20.11.09. NUJ President secretary James Doherty in a lighter moment before the start of the National Union of Journalists Annual Delegate Meeting in Southport, England on Friday 20 November 2008. NUJ members from across the county have come together to tackle the major issues effecting media workers in Britain today. (Photo by Marc Vallee/marcvallee.co.uk) (c) Marc Vallée, 2009.


CIF – Good news for photographers
August 22nd, 2009

cif_home_office
Link.

“Good news for photographers”Marc Vallée, The Guardian.

I have written piece for The Guardian’s Liberty Central about the “I’m a Photographer, Not a Terrorist!” campaign and the new Home Office advice on counter-terrorism legislation and photography in a public place.


New government advice on Photography & Counter-Terrorism
August 21st, 2009

home_office_letter_to_jd_070809
Link (pdf).

“Home Office letter on Photography and Counter-Terrorism – pdf”From David Hanson MP – Minister of State responsible for crime and policing to Jeremy Dear – National Union of Journalists General Secretary.

“Home Office circular 012 / 2009 – Photography and Counter-Terrorism legislation”homeoffice.gove.uk

On Tuesday (18.08.09) the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism at the Home Office sent out new advice to all the Chief Police Officers in the UK to “clarify counter-terrorism legislation in relation to photography in a public place”.

In a letter about the new advice from David Hanson MP – the Minister of State responsible for crime and policing – to Jeremy Dear – the National Union of Journalists General Secretary – the minister writes in the closing paragraph on Section 58A of the Terrorism Act 2000,

“I believe this circular removes once and for all any suggestion that the new offence can be used to prosecute innocent photographers such as responsible journalists, simply because they are taking a photograph of a police officer.”

A victory for photographers? To read more about this go to the “I’m a Photographer, Not a Terrorist!” website.


CIF – The Met see sense on the media
July 31st, 2009

cif_met_sense_media
Link.

“The Met see sense on the media”Marc Vallée, The Guardian.

For The Guardian toady I have written about new guidelines from the Metropolitan police which reinforce the rights of press photographers working in public.


Journalists Launch Civil Action Against Police
July 28th, 2009

“Police should respect press freedom”Olly Zanetti, The Guardian.

“Photographers complain about police obstruction”Kate Day, blogs.telegraph.co.uk

“Photographers take action against the Met”National Union of Journalists

Today my solicitor served papers on the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. Due to legal reasons I can not say anything about the case but the links above and below should give you all the information and background you need.

Past blog posts:

“Police to investigate Greek embassy incident”blog.marcvallee.co.uk

“Video: Journalists obstructed at Greek Embassy protest”blog.marcvallee.co.uk

“Can I have my lens hood back officer?” – blog.marcvallee.co.uk


Comment is free: The Met’s attack on photographers
July 9th, 2009

ciff_met_s76_more
Link.

“The Met’s attack on photographers” – Marc Vallée, The Guardian.

I have written about how anti-terrorism laws are creating a hostile environment for photography in public spaces for The Guardian today.

210309_marcvallee_yarls_wood_detention_centre_protest_s76_1
BEDFORD, UNITED KINGDOM – 21.03.09. A Bedfordshire Police sergeant questions a press photographer under new counter terrorism laws on Saturday 21 March 2009 in Bedfordshire, England. Justin Tallis, a London based freelance photographer and NUJ and BPPA member, was photographing an anti-immigration detention centre protest outside Yarl’s Wood Detention Centre in Bedfordshire. The new controversial anti-terror law, section 76 of the Counter Terrorism Act 2008, came into force on Monday 16th February 2009. On the enforcement date hundreds of photographers staged a mass photo taking event outside New Scotland Yard in protest to the new law. (Photo by Marc Vallée/marcvallee.co.uk) (c) Marc Vallée, 2009.


Gambian Journalists Protest – (03.07.09)
July 3rd, 2009

030709_marc_vallee_gambian_journalists_protest_blog
LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM – 03.07.09. Journalists and human rights activists protest outside the Gambian High Commission in London on Friday 3 July 2009 in London, England. Seven journalists and members of the Gambia Press Union were arrested by the Gambian National Intelligence Agency on 15 June 2009 and charged with publishing, and conspiracy to publish, seditious material contrary to Gambia’s Criminal Code. The London protest – organised by National Union of Journalists, Amnesty International and the TUC – marked the start of the hearings and were part of a series of demonstrations organised by the International Federation of Journalists from across the world. (Photo by Marc Vallée/marcvallee.co.uk) (c) Marc Vallée, 2009.

“Protest over trial of African journalists’ leaders”National Union of Journalists.

“TUC urges Gambian Government to stop journalists’ trial”TUC.

“UK-Gambia: UK trade unions and Amnesty International call for halt to journalists’ trial”Amnesty International.

Link : Click here to view more images.

Clients : Images are available for rights managed editorial licensing. High resolution images are available on request.

030709_marc_vallee_gambian_journalists_protest_blog_2
LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM – 03.07.09. NUJ Deputy General Secretary Michelle Stanistreet joins journalists and human rights activists protest outside the Gambian High Commission in London on Friday 3 July 2009 in London, England. Seven journalists and members of the Gambia Press Union were arrested by the Gambian National Intelligence Agency on 15 June 2009 and charged with publishing, and conspiracy to publish, seditious material contrary to Gambia’s Criminal Code. The London protest – organised by National Union of Journalists, Amnesty International and the TUC – marked the start of the hearings and were part of a series of demonstrations organised by the International Federation of Journalists from across the world. (Photo by Marc Vallée/marcvallee.co.uk) (c) Marc Vallée, 2009.


The Media, Section 14 & the G20
June 30th, 2009

020409_marcvallee_g20_protest_s14_2
LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM – 02.04.09. A City of London police inspector orders the media to leave the area as police ‘kettle” protesters outside the Bank of England on Thursday 2 April 2009 in London, England. The police officer ordered members of the media to leave the area for 30 minutes under the threat of arrest by citing Section 14 of the Public Order Act 1986. The protesters had congregated to mark the death of a man who had died on an anti-G20 protest the day before. (Photo by Marc Vallée/marcvallee.co.uk) (c) Marc Vallée, 2009.

“Home Affairs Committee – Eighth Report – Policing of the G20 Protests”publications.parliament.uk

“MPs condemn ‘dismissive’ police treatment of journalists”Press Gazette.

This is what the lawmakers had to say about the use of Section 14 of the Public Order Act – to disperse journalists at a protest to mark the death of Ian Tomlinson – a newspaper vendor – who had died the day before on an anti-G20 protest.

“We heard from Jeremy Dear that Section 14 was used in an apparently pre-meditated fashion to remove journalists from an area, rather than as a response to “serious public disorder”. We will return to general questions on the use of Section 14 later, but if, as Jeremy Dear alleged, it was used in this fashion then it would clearly be a misuse of powers granted to the police. The fact that the police have in both cases apologised does not excuse the fact that forcing members of the press to leave an area without justification sends out completely the wrong signal of the police’s intentions and does not help the police build strong relationships with the media. For this reason alone the misuse of Section 14 must be addressed.”

This is what I wrote in The Guardian in April on the use of Section 14:

“The day after Tomlinson’s death we had a City of London police inspector, backup by a group of territorial support group officers, ordering the media to leave the area as police “kettle” protesters who had congregated to mark his death. The police officer ordered 20 members of the media to leave the area for 30 minutes under the threat of arrest by citing section 14 of the Public Order Act 1986 (pdf).

“This film, also published by the Guardian, shows the journalists (including me) having a “conversation” with the inspector. At one point he tells me to “shut up” when I question him about his actions. You have to ask yourself why section 14 was used against a group of working journalists. Why did the police want the journalists to be moved away from the protest for 30 minutes and 200 yards up the road? And why all of this was done under the threat of arrest?”

So why did the police want a group of journalists moved away from a protest for 30 minutes and 200 yards up the road? And why was all of this done under the threat of arrest?

These questions still need to be answered.

“UK: Journalists on the front line”blog.marcvallee.co.uk

“Video: G20 Police use public order act on the media.”blog.marcvallee.co.uk

“G20 Police use public order act on the media.”blog.marcvallee.co.uk


Comment is free: Police surveillance of journalists
June 23rd, 2009

The police even follow me into the loo - Marc Vallée - Comment is free - guardian.co
Link.

“The police even follow me into the loo” – Marc Vallée, The Guardian.

I have written about police surveillance of journalists for The Guardian today.